Link List
Search me
Breakdown of statistics
10 days Breakdown on Active Cases viz Death and Recoveries ratios in Pakistan |
This is to confirm that the said data is taken from the Government of Pakistan COVID-19 official portal
یہ کسی کرکٹ گیم کا اسکورنک گراف نہیں ہے بلکہ پاکستان میں کنفرم کیسز کا نمبر شمار ہے |
پاکستان میں اصل مسئلہ یہاں ہے کہ پیچھے سے نئے کیسز آنے کی رفتار میں کمی نہیں آرہی یے |
ایک رسک ہے یہاں کیونکہ اگر دیکھا جائے تو اموات کا ریشو آہستہ آہستہ اوپر کی جانب جارہا ہے جس کو مدنظر رکھنا ضروری ہے |
ہمارے میڈیا کی شر انگیزی
میں ذیادہ تر میڈیا کے مخالف رہا ہوں مگر یہاں میں اس نیوز میڈیا اینکر سے agreed ہوں، کیونکہ یہاں psychological mind programming ہورہی ہے، کہ ایک چیز بار بار اتنی دفعہ دکھائو کہ جھوٹ بھی سچ دکھنے لگے، اب مجھے یہ بتائیں، یہ خصلت کس کی ہے؟ شیطان مردود کی، اور اس وقت کون act کر رہا ہے؟ ہمارا میڈیا۔۔۔ کیونکہ مجھے خود محسوس ہوا، کیونکہ اگر اتنا سخت ہونا ہوتا تو اس وقت صرف کراچی میں اتنے patients دل کے عارضے میں مبتلا ہے، یہ کیسے ممکن ہے کہ صرف کراچی میں دل کے عارضے کے patients کی count گر گئی؟
میں خود۔۔۔
میں نے خود ٹی وی دیکھنا بند کر دیا ہے، یہ الگ بات ہے کہ بینکنگ میں ویسے بھی ٹائم نہیں ملتا مگر کوشش یہی کرتا ہوں کہ ٹی وی دیکھنے سے اجتناب کرتا ہوں۔ صرف بلوگنگ یا پھر Youtube پر پرانے کرکٹ کے میچز یا analysis دیکھ رہا ہوں، بلکہ میرے گھر میں دو ٹی وی ہیں، دونوں کے set top boxes پر چینلز کو limited کردیا ہے، باقی چینلز کی فریکیونسیز کو ہٹا دیا ہے، اور یقین مانیئے میں ذاتی طور پر بہت پر سکون ہوں، اکثر عشاٗ کی نماز مسجد جا کر ہی پڑھ رہا ہوں، مگر اس طرح ذہن پراگندہ نہیں ہوا، یہی حل ہے، کیونکہ میں نے اپنے ذہن کو مفلوج ہونے نہیں دیا ہے۔میڈیا کا لگام وقت کی ضرورت ہے
مجھے اس سے کوئی فرق نہیں پڑتا، کیونکہ میں unlike میڈیا at least کسی کو پراگندہ نہیں کرتا نہ وہ شر انگیزی اور دہشت گردی کر رہا ہوں جو ہمارا میڈیا کر رہا ہے، کیونکہ ۲۰۰۲ سے اب تک ہمارا میڈیا یہی کرتا رہا ہے، liberation کے نام پر ہماری society کو جو ناقابل فہم نقصان اس میڈیا نے دیا ہے، اس کے لیئے میڈیا کو اس چیز کے لیئے یقینا جوابدہ ہیں۔Trying to view the disease's stats in a newer way...
This statistics is of per-day gradual improvement/degrades on daily basis |
There is light on the end of the tunnel
This is something we have forgotten that the situation is gradually changing within some hours period and for which we require to view the statistics not on the basis of aggregate statistics instead viewing it on the daily basis, where we analyze the strike rate on daily basis, therefore while analyzing the resonance clearly shows variation especially the last portion where it clearly raises an objection where and what are the basis upon which these statistics are collected, because the variation is certainly unnatural.
Why I am saying this
The Spanish Flu
As we know, the “Spanish Flu,” so named because initial media reports
suggested that the influenza originated in Spain rather than in U.S.
Army training camps, devastated the United States and Europe in the
final year of World War I. The world of 1918 was far less globalized
than the world of today, with lower levels of international trade and
international travel. Nevertheless, the influenza spread rapidly,
attacking in three distinct waves in countries around the world.
Distance provided little protection. The war itself helped spread the
disease, as U.S. soldiers brought it to Europe, and Europeans spread it
across the rest of the world. The flu made its mark on the great nations
of East Asia as well, although with vastly different effects in each.
Japan was a co-belligerent of Britain and France in World War I, but had largely stayed out of intense warfare since the reduction of German concessions in China in 1914, although intervention in the Soviet Union in 1918 would bring Japanese troops back into action. Influenza struck the Japanese Army in November 1918, peaking about a month after the flu hit the armies on the Western Front in France. The death rate was somewhat lower in the Japanese Army than in its European counterparts, perhaps because operational demands interfered with treatment in the latter. Still, some 6-8 percent of victims of the influenza died. Overall, between 400,000 and 500,000 Japanese died of the Spanish Flu, with the population displaying the same “W” shape of morbidity that appeared in the West (the flu killed the young, the old, and a high percentage of young adults). Another 200,000 people died in Japanese-occupied Korea and Taiwan.
Influenza devastated British India, killing some 18 million people. India had supplied substantial personnel to the British, both in fighting strength and in auxiliaries. The disease spread quickly from its epicenter at Bombay, while colonial officials dithered and denied the severity of the outbreak. Mohandas K. Gandhi contracted the illness, but survived. The impact of the flu helped demonstrate the underlying weakness of the British imperial system, however, and facilitated the strengthening of the pro-independence movement.
The flu may have touched only lightly upon China. Unlike India, China was not fully colonized by European powers, leaving much of its agrarian population isolated from disease-spreading colonials. Unlike Japan, China’s population remained primarily agrarian in the first decades of the 20th century. Some suggest that traditional Chinese medicine, which had historically focused on the management of epidemics, may have played a role in limiting the spread and virulence of the virus. We should take this conclusion with a grain of salt, as China had little in the way of an effective central government at the time and consequently there are few good statistics about the impact of the virus.
Each of Japan, India, and China face much different problems today than they faced in 1918. Still, the Spanish Flu left a mark on all of them, with the impact mediated by differences in governing structure and in relationship to international society. It’s worthwhile for modern policymakers to keep the 1918 pandemic in mind when considering responses in 2020.
ShareJapan was a co-belligerent of Britain and France in World War I, but had largely stayed out of intense warfare since the reduction of German concessions in China in 1914, although intervention in the Soviet Union in 1918 would bring Japanese troops back into action. Influenza struck the Japanese Army in November 1918, peaking about a month after the flu hit the armies on the Western Front in France. The death rate was somewhat lower in the Japanese Army than in its European counterparts, perhaps because operational demands interfered with treatment in the latter. Still, some 6-8 percent of victims of the influenza died. Overall, between 400,000 and 500,000 Japanese died of the Spanish Flu, with the population displaying the same “W” shape of morbidity that appeared in the West (the flu killed the young, the old, and a high percentage of young adults). Another 200,000 people died in Japanese-occupied Korea and Taiwan.
Influenza devastated British India, killing some 18 million people. India had supplied substantial personnel to the British, both in fighting strength and in auxiliaries. The disease spread quickly from its epicenter at Bombay, while colonial officials dithered and denied the severity of the outbreak. Mohandas K. Gandhi contracted the illness, but survived. The impact of the flu helped demonstrate the underlying weakness of the British imperial system, however, and facilitated the strengthening of the pro-independence movement.
The flu may have touched only lightly upon China. Unlike India, China was not fully colonized by European powers, leaving much of its agrarian population isolated from disease-spreading colonials. Unlike Japan, China’s population remained primarily agrarian in the first decades of the 20th century. Some suggest that traditional Chinese medicine, which had historically focused on the management of epidemics, may have played a role in limiting the spread and virulence of the virus. We should take this conclusion with a grain of salt, as China had little in the way of an effective central government at the time and consequently there are few good statistics about the impact of the virus.
Each of Japan, India, and China face much different problems today than they faced in 1918. Still, the Spanish Flu left a mark on all of them, with the impact mediated by differences in governing structure and in relationship to international society. It’s worthwhile for modern policymakers to keep the 1918 pandemic in mind when considering responses in 2020.
سبسکرائب کریں در:
اشاعتیں (Atom)